Mount Ashland trail & lift map, slopes and snow forecast

Mount Ashland: piste map and stats

Mount Ashland is a ski resort in Oregon, United States. 56% of its kilometres are easy runs: good for learning. It has 14 km of pistes across 40 named runs and 4 lifts. The ski area goes from 1,925 to 2,279 m of altitude, with 354 m of vertical. Its steepest runs (steepest 50 m stretch) are Upper Winter (58%, 30°), Upper Tempest (58%, 30°) and Upper Bottom (57%, 29°). The longest run is Caliban (1.0 km). The nearest ski resort is Mt. Shasta Ski Park, 94 km away. Here you'll find every run with its gradient profile, the lifts and the on-mountain services; the interactive map shows them on satellite imagery.

Snow and weather at Mount Ashland

Snow forecast for the next 7 days (summit, 2,279 m): 19 cm (updated 14 November).

Terrain by difficulty

Green

0.3 km · 1

Blue

7.6 km · 24

Black

4.6 km · 11

Double black

1.0 km · 4

Unclassified

0.6 km · 3

Lifts by type

Chairlift

2.0 km · 4

Runs, lifts and services

tap a run to see its profile

Sonnetmax 15% · 8°

274 m · 33 m vertical · avg. gradient 12.2% · 2,007–2,040 m altitude

Calibanmax 36% · 20°

958 m · 242 m vertical · avg. gradient 25.2% · 2,007–2,249 m altitude

Rodger's Waymax 21% · 12°

700 m · 82 m vertical · avg. gradient 11.7% · 1,925–2,007 m altitude

Betwixtmax 20% · 11°

569 m · 72 m vertical · avg. gradient 12.6% · 1,961–2,033 m altitude

Dreammax 40% · 22°

543 m · 167 m vertical · avg. gradient 30.7% · 2,007–2,174 m altitude

Doug's Runmax 22% · 12°

476 m · 57 m vertical · avg. gradient 12.0% · 1,925–1,982 m altitude · Classic trackFloodlit

Lower Wintermax 48% · 25°

473 m · 181 m vertical · avg. gradient 38.3% · 1,941–2,122 m altitude

Upper Romeomax 48% · 26°

457 m · 140 m vertical · avg. gradient 30.6% · 2,019–2,159 m altitude

Lower Tempestmax 40% · 22°

431 m · 149 m vertical · avg. gradient 34.6% · 1,950–2,100 m altitude

West Dreammax 27% · 15°

394 m · 104 m vertical · avg. gradient 26.5% · 2,117–2,222 m altitude · Classic track

Upper Dreammax 36% · 20°

322 m · 105 m vertical · avg. gradient 32.6% · 2,174–2,279 m altitude

Lower Romeomax 41% · 22°

299 m · 86 m vertical · avg. gradient 28.9% · 1,933–2,019 m altitude

Aisle Onemax 16% · 9°

291 m · 45 m vertical · avg. gradient 15.5% · 1,982–2,029 m altitude · 3 sections

All's Wellmax 23% · 13°

281 m · 62 m vertical · avg. gradient 21.9% · 1,963–2,024 m altitude

Lower Julietmax 29% · 16°

271 m · 60 m vertical · avg. gradient 22.0% · 1,973–2,033 m altitude

Avonmax 25% · 14°

238 m · 59 m vertical · avg. gradient 24.9% · 2,100–2,159 m altitude

Dan's Slotmax 38% · 21°

219 m · 73 m vertical · avg. gradient 33.3% · 1,960–2,033 m altitudeFloodlit

Lupinemax 46% · 25°

217 m · 51 m vertical · avg. gradient 23.5% · 1,982–2,034 m altitude

Pomamax 54% · 28°

182 m · 63 m vertical · avg. gradient 34.6% · 1,977–2,040 m altitude

Lower Bottommax 37% · 20°

172 m · 54 m vertical · avg. gradient 31.1% · 1,949–2,002 m altitude

Upper Juliet, Aisle Onemax 3% · 2°

51 m · 4 m vertical · avg. gradient 8.2% · 2,029–2,033 m altitude

Bull Gap Nordic, Aisle Onemax 0% · 0°

49 m · 3 m vertical · avg. gradient 5.7% · 1,990–2,003 m altitude · Backcountry · 2 sections

Circemax 52% · 27°

653 m · 116 m vertical · avg. gradient 17.8% · 2,162–2,279 m altitude

Ariel Chairlinemax 41% · 22°

606 m · 263 m vertical · avg. gradient 43.4% · 2,008–2,272 m altitude

Adomax 43% · 23°

574 m · 188 m vertical · avg. gradient 32.7% · 2,039–2,227 m altitude

Pistolmax 50% · 26°

570 m · 212 m vertical · avg. gradient 37.1% · 1,963–2,174 m altitude

Balconymax 42% · 23°

497 m · 132 m vertical · avg. gradient 26.5% · 2,147–2,279 m altitude

Upper Bottommax 57% · 29°

396 m · 157 m vertical · avg. gradient 39.7% · 2,002–2,159 m altitude

Upper Tempestmax 58% · 30°

362 m · 168 m vertical · avg. gradient 46.4% · 2,100–2,268 m altitude

Upper Julietmax 42% · 23°

308 m · 100 m vertical · avg. gradient 32.4% · 2,029–2,128 m altitude

Upper Wintermax 58% · 30°

284 m · 137 m vertical · avg. gradient 48.1% · 2,122–2,259 m altitudeTree skiing

Coolwatermax 38% · 21°

222 m · 85 m vertical · avg. gradient 38.1% · 2,054–2,139 m altitude

Wong'smax 42% · 23°

112 m · 56 m vertical · avg. gradient 49.7% · 2,193–2,249 m altitude · Backcountry

Chute 1max 66% · 33°

320 m · 103 m vertical · avg. gradient 32.2% · 2,176–2,279 m altitude · Backcountry

Chute 2max 69% · 35°

278 m · 88 m vertical · avg. gradient 31.7% · 2,176–2,264 m altitude · Backcountry

Chute 3max 71% · 35°

244 m · 81 m vertical · avg. gradient 33.1% · 2,177–2,258 m altitude · Backcountry

Chute 4max 45% · 24°

182 m · 54 m vertical · avg. gradient 29.5% · 2,182–2,236 m altitude · Backcountry

Blossommax 15% · 8°

255 m · 24 m vertical · avg. gradient 9.4% · 2,016–2,040 m altitude

Mercutiomax 39% · 21°

237 m · 77 m vertical · avg. gradient 32.6% · 2,039–2,116 m altitude

Chute 5max 8% · 5°

101 m · 12 m vertical · avg. gradient 11.7% · 2,183–2,194 m altitude

Frequently asked questions

How many kilometres of pistes does Mount Ashland have?

Mount Ashland has 14 km of pistes, measured run by run on the map: 40 named runs and 4 lifts.

What altitude is Mount Ashland at?

Its runs and lifts go from 1,925 to 2,279 m of altitude, with 354 m of vertical.

What is the steepest run at Mount Ashland?

Upper Winter, with a 58% gradient on its steepest 50 m stretch.

What is the longest run at Mount Ashland?

Caliban, at 1.0 km.

What runs does Mount Ashland have by difficulty?

Green: 0.3 km (1 runs); Blue: 7.6 km (21 runs); Black: 4.6 km (11 runs); Double black: 1.0 km (4 runs); Unclassified: 0.6 km (3 runs).

About this data

Piste km: the length of each piste, measured once along its line on the map. Resorts usually advertise more, as they add itineraries, variants or wide pistes counted as several runs; and sometimes a piste is still missing from OpenStreetMap.

Data quality

Named runs43 / 43

Difficulty tagged93%

Lighting tagged5%

Snowmaking tagged0%

Lift capacity tagged100%

Grip type tagged0%

Snowmaking and ski patrol are rarely tagged in OpenStreetMap — it doesn't mean they don't exist, just that hardly anyone maps them yet.