‹ Ski resorts in ItalySki Info

Buffaure - Ciampac: piste map and stats

Buffaure - Ciampac is a ski resort in Trento, Italy. It has 26 km of pistes across 23 named runs and 12 lifts. The ski area goes from 1,332 to 2,435 m of altitude, with 1,103 m of vertical. Its steepest runs (steepest 50 m stretch) are Ciampac (59%, 31°), Vulcano (53%, 28°) and Variante Roseal (50%, 27°). The longest run is Buffaure Panorama (5.4 km). The nearest ski resort is Arabba, 4 km away. Here you'll find every run with its gradient profile, the lifts and the on-mountain services; the interactive map shows them on satellite imagery.

Snow and weather at Buffaure - Ciampac

Snow forecast for the next 7 days (summit, 2,435 m): 1 cm (updated 14 November).

Terrain by difficulty

Blue
2.5 km · 11
Red
16.7 km · 26
Black
6.6 km · 9

Lifts by type

Chairlift
6.8 km · 7
Gondola
3.7 km · 2
Platter lift
1.0 km · 2
Magic carpet
0.1 km · 1

Runs, lifts and services

tap a run to see its profile
Frequently asked questions

How many kilometres of pistes does Buffaure - Ciampac have?

Buffaure - Ciampac has 26 km of pistes, measured run by run on the map: 23 named runs and 12 lifts.

What altitude is Buffaure - Ciampac at?

Its runs and lifts go from 1,332 to 2,435 m of altitude, with 1,103 m of vertical.

What is the steepest run at Buffaure - Ciampac?

Ciampac, with a 59% gradient on its steepest 50 m stretch.

What is the longest run at Buffaure - Ciampac?

Buffaure Panorama, at 5.4 km.

What runs does Buffaure - Ciampac have by difficulty?

Blue: 1.9 km (5 runs); Red: 16.2 km (13 runs); Black: 6.6 km (5 runs).

About this data

Piste km: the length of each piste, measured once along its line on the map. Resorts usually advertise more, as they add itineraries, variants or wide pistes counted as several runs; and sometimes a piste is still missing from OpenStreetMap.

Data quality

Named runs29 / 46
Difficulty tagged100%
Lighting tagged11%
Snowmaking tagged0%
Lift capacity tagged92%
Grip type tagged17%

Snowmaking and ski patrol are rarely tagged in OpenStreetMap — it doesn't mean they don't exist, just that hardly anyone maps them yet.